Notes from the Town Administrator
opportunity to provide occasional reports to Jamestowners about community issues before your town government.
Through this forum, I hope to keep readers informed about the status of current projects and programs that the town has underway. Certainly, it has already struck me in the short time that I have been the town administrator that the size of the island community has little to do with the number and variety of important and exciting concerns that percolate on a day to day basis.
Consequently, as time permits, I foresee ample opportunity over the coming months to fill this space with interesting news and comment.
It is apparent that the most prominent and pressing issue confronting the town is the 20-yearlong effort to site and construct a much-needed new highway barn.
Following the defeat of a $2.4 million referendum in November 2004 to locate the barn at Taylor Point, voters were presented with a proposal to use the landfill for this purpose. In June 2005, the voters approved an allocation of $75,000 to be used for consulting and engineering of a highway garage in conjunction with the landfill closure.
A Request for Qualifications was advertised to hire an engineering consultant for the highway garage and GZA, the firm that has been involved since 1999 with the landfill closure process, was selected. With this approval, GZA, the town's engineering consultant, was directed to design and incorporate a highway barn into the landfill closure design in a manner that would meet all requirements and standards necessary to close the landfill in a safe and environmentally sound manner.
The highway garage design began in July 2005. In order to ensure compliance with state environmental regulations governing municipal landfills, the town and GZA have worked closely with the Department of Environmental Management's Office of Waste Management staff throughout the site assessment and review process.
To properly understand the management of the closure action and the role of the highway barn as a new component, several key milestones are worth noting. In May 2002, GZA released a Site Investigation Report describing its findings about the location and composition of the buried solid waste and the quality of the ground water beneath the landfill.
The SIR indicated that the solid waste was typical of residential household waste deposited over many years and that now is largely decomposed. Groundwater testing obtained from 13 monitoring wells placed in and around the perimeter of the site has documented that water quality currently meets drinking water standards as potable water.
Further, review of testing results from monitoring wells installed in the 1980s following the closing of the active landfill facility reveal that water quality beneath the landfill has been improving. Methane gas monitoring has shown intermittent, localized concentrations that are characteristic of decomposing waste at a municipal landfill.
Relying on accepted environmental engineering practices and the EPA and the DEM approved analytical methods, GZA has developed plans to permanently close the landfill. In summary, the plans released in July 2005 as the 30 percent design stage detail the following main closure actions:
+ Establishment of a minimum 2-foot vegetated soil cover necessary to reduce infiltration through the landfill.
+ Development of stormwater control systems and structures to manage run-off in an environmentally safe manner; These include creation of detention ponds, installing catch basins and drainage piping.
+ Excavate waste buried within areas that will be used for detention and water quality ponds, and haul solid waste off-site to the RI Central landfill.
+ Maintain ongoing water quality monitoring systems for 15 years to track the constituents in the groundwater at the closed landfill.
It is significant to emphasize that each of these actions is required to close the landfill with or without the construction of the highway barn at the southwest corner of the property.
In 2005, GZA incorporated the highway garage into the design. We are currently at the 50 percent level of design which includes all of the above improvements to the landfill and the following new items:
+ Build a 12,500 foot Highway Barn with a paved parking area.
+ Excavate the site of the new facility adjacent to North Main Road and haul this solid waste off-site.
+ Expand the stormwater controls to incorporate the run-off from the highway barn and paved parking area.
The 50-percent design has been submitted to the DEM for review and action in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to landfill closures. As the designated state authority for environmental protection, the DEM is evaluating GZA's proposal and will determine what modifications if any are necessary prior to granting approval to move forward to final permitting. We expect to receive DEM's comments within the next few weeks.
This issue has become highly contentious within the community as signified by the more than 400 letters of comment to the DEM and the activism of the North End Concerned Citizens.
Clearly there are concerns regarding the environmental impacts of the landfill both in its current unaltered (pre-closure) condition as well as with the remediation measures proposed in the closure plans.
In my discussions with the members of the Town Council, town staff, and GZA personnel, it is clear that decisions regarding the future of the landfill site will be driven by scientific fact and proven environmental engineering methods.
Further, professionals educated in their specific disciplines at both the DEM and the Department of Health are dedicated to responsibly protecting our human and environmental health. In the coming weeks, important strategic and budgetary choices will be made to close-out an inactive landfill and to consider the siting of the highway barn.
Regardless of the outcome, I am confident that the decisions will be reached after careful and comprehensive review of all relevant information.