2007-05-10 / Editorial

Musings

By Robert Morton-Ranney

In the first debate among Democratic presidential candidates, each candidate was asked how they would respond if two U.S. cities were leveled by nuclear devices planted by al Qaeda. Moderator Brian Williams, trying so hard to bring gravity to his position, didn't mention North Korea or Iran, or anybody else. Then, during the Republican debate, Rudy Giuliani lambasted the Democratic candidates for not using the phrase 'Islamic fundamentalist terrorism' during their debate.

So, it's official, al Qaeda has been installed as the new and improved, bigger and better bogeyman. The latest metaphor for All Things To Be Feared.

Forty and fifty years ago, the same question felt even more chilling, but then, of course, the evildoer posited at the other end was the Soviet Union.

Twenty years earlier, before Hiroshima and Nagasaki gave worldwide fears a new scale, it was in the form of German submarines launching commando raids- in Narragansett Bay, among other places.

Oh, and we mustn't forget that little Orson Wells episode.

Now, we imagine horrible things about roaming Arabs contemplating heavenly virgins.

When the Prime Minister of Australia made remarks to the effect that an event such as the Virginia Tech shootings was unlikely to occur in his country because Australian attitudes toward and laws around guns are so different from ours, one talk-show listener phoned in to scream that when al Qaeda takes over down under we all know it will be the good ole US of A who comes to their rescue.

Apparently, our caller forgot that the Aussies have troops in Iraq. Momentary lapse, I'm sure.

All roads now lead to al Qaeda.

Of course al Qaeda is dangerous. So is driving over to visit your grandmother. And missing your annual physical.

What we focus on matters. And if we only focus on one thing all the time, we miss everything else.

Focusing too much on al Qaeda can make one forget that Sunnis and Shiites have been at odds for longer than there have been Protestants and Catholics. It can lead one to forget that the gap between have-somes and the have-a-lots in the U.S. and around the world keeps getting bigger. It can make you feel like rising temperatures don't matter.

Say, there's a new career for an up-and-coming social commentator. Find a way to blame al Qaeda for global warming.

This new enemy is more delicious than we've had in a while, isn't it. After all, those godless communists didn't even believe in God. Now Americans, arguably the most religious Christian nation in the world, have an enemy that, if anything, is even more religious than we are.

To be more specific, they are looking for ways to become martyrs with an enthusiasm Christianity hasn't seen in 1700 years.

It's fascinating to note the view of one scholar that Islam as a whole, younger than the Jesus movement by some seven centuries, may be going through a messy process of overall institutionalization not unlike what Christianity experienced in earlier times. The idea is that no broad consensus has yet emerged as to what matters most at the heart of their expressions of their faith and, until it does, the world will have to endure further convulsions of one sort or another.

But, hey, who cares what's really going on? Nuance is for non-deciders. The important thing is that there's an enemy out there who, in the eyes of many Americans, believes in God the wrong way. And nothing gets their juices flowing more easily. It makes Protestant vs. Catholic look like kid stuff.

For those who don't get quite as excited about the religious angle, there's the fact that they don't dress like us. Visual distinctions are a big help in maintaining the notion that someone is an enemy. This was a problem with the Soviets, and so the economics button had to be pushed hard and often.

On the other hand, the Russian language was very different, and even had its own alphabet, which made it easier to distrust, and, therefore, fear them. Arabic fills the same slot.

The biggest thing, of course, is that they live somewhere else. And it's never too difficult to look askance at people who live far away.

Al Qaeda claimed responsibly for the worst terrorist attack on US soil. Why wouldn't a great many people hate them for that?

But we wanted so much to respond to our newfound enemy that apparently we didn't pause to ask enough questions before setting out to make the world in our own image, one more time.

Al Qaeda. The perfect label for the latest image of an all-season, general-purpose, multi-functional enemy. Many people want us to believe they will take away life as we know it any moment.

There is no question that figuring out how to live in a world with people who do things differently, some of whom can be very dangerous, is a tricky business.

At the same time, the most important freedom we have is to decide for ourselves what actually needs our attention.

Does it matter who the next President is going to be? Yes, but so does eating vegetables.

Should we plan for possibilities around enemy-induced disasters? Yes, but not all of us. Some of us should concentrate on remembering to buy a Mother's Day card. Most of us, in fact. And putting out the blue and green bins and saving up for those funny new light bulbs. And thanking friends for hanging in.

FDR was right. But, perhaps, the one thing we do have to fear more than fear itself, is the possibility that someone has a vested interest in keeping us afraid.

Return to top